Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Changed license GPLv3 to MIT
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
NeXTs committed Jan 22, 2023
1 parent 0cbaebe commit 44055fe
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 23 additions and 13 deletions.
22 changes: 16 additions & 6 deletions LICENSE
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,11 +1,21 @@
The GPLv3 License (GPLv3)
The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2015 Denis Lukov

Commercial license
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

If you want to use Clusterize.js to develop commercial sites, themes, projects, and applications, the Commercial license is the appropriate license. With this option, your source code is kept proprietary. Purchase a Clusterize.js Commercial License at uplabs.com/posts/clusterize-js-commercial-license
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

Open source license

If you are creating an open source application under a license compatible with the GNU GPL license v3, you may use this project under the terms of the GPLv3.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion bower.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,6 @@
"authors": [
"Denis Lukov"
],
"license": "GPLv3",
"license": "MIT",
"homepage": "https://github.com/NeXTs/Clusterize.js"
}
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions clusterize.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Clusterize.js - v0.19.0 - 2021-12-19
/* Clusterize.js - v1.0.0 - 2023-01-22
http://NeXTs.github.com/Clusterize.js/
Copyright (c) 2015 Denis Lukov; Licensed GPLv3 */
Copyright (c) 2015 Denis Lukov; Licensed MIT */

;(function(name, definition) {
if (typeof module != 'undefined') module.exports = definition();
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions clusterize.min.js

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "clusterize.js",
"version": "0.19.0",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Tiny vanilla JS plugin to display large data sets easily",
"main": "clusterize.js",
"style": "clusterize.css",
Expand All @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
"cluster"
],
"author": "Denis Lukov",
"license": "GPLv3",
"license": "MIT",
"bugs": {
"url": "https://github.com/NeXTs/Clusterize.js/issues"
},
Expand Down

1 comment on commit 44055fe

@Zaczero
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First of all, what a great project – so simple, yet so powerful. However, I've recently become aware of two potential GPL violations and I'm reaching out to seek your input on this matter.

As the author of your work, you have the freedom to re-license the code. However, the same principle doesn't extend to any contributions that this project received during its time under the GPL license.

I'm curious to know if you've obtained permission from @mudcube and @styfle, as their contributions were originally made under the GPL license and, from what I can see, are still present in the code:

If they have explicitly agreed to the re-licensing of the code, that's great, and I apologize for any disturbance! However, if their permission wasn't obtained, their contributions should be removed from the MIT-licensed code.

Please sign in to comment.